CSPM EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 2 (2023) Security and Safety, 2 (2023) 2023020 References
Issue
Security and Safety
Volume 2, 2023
Security and Safety in Unmanned Systems
Article Number 2023020
Number of page(s) 17
Section Other Fields
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/sands/2023020
Published online 23 August 2023
  1. Fahlstrom PG, Gleason TJ and Sadraey MH. Introduction to UAV Systems. John Wiley & Sons, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  2. Kim J, Kim S and Ju C et al. Unmanned aerial vehicles in agriculture: a review of perspective of platform, control, and applications. IEEE Access 2019; 7: 105100–15. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Tang L, Roemer M and Ge JH et al. Methodologies for adaptive flight envelope estimation and protection. In: AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference. AIAA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  4. Harno HG and Kim Y. Safe flight envelope estimation for rotorcraft: a reachability approach. In: 18th International Conference on Control, Automation and Systems (ICCAS). IEEE, 2018, 998–1002. [Google Scholar]
  5. van den Brandt R and de Visser CC. Safe flight envelope uncertainty quantification using probabilistic reachability analysis. IFAC-Pap 2018; 51: 628–35. [Google Scholar]
  6. Lu ZD, Hong HC and Gerdts M et al. Flight envelope prediction via optimal control-based reachability analysis. J Guid Control Dyn 2022; 45: 185–95. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Lee H, Snyder S and Hovakimyan N. L1 adaptive control within a flight envelope protection system. J Guid Control Dyn 2017; 40: 1013–26. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Belcastro C and Foster J. Aircraft loss-of-control accident analysis. In: AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference. AIAA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  9. Falkena W, Borst C and Chu QP et al. Investigation of practical flight envelope protection systems for small aircraft. J Guid Control Dyn 2011; 34: 976–988. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Nabi HN, Lombaerts T and Zhang Y et al. Effects of structural failure on the safe flight envelope of aircraft. J Guid Control Dyn 2018; 41: 1257–75. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Zhang Y, de Visser CC and Chu QP. Online safe flight envelope prediction for damaged aircraft: a database-driven approach, In: AIAA Modeling and Simulation Technologies Conference. AIAA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  12. Lombaerts T, Schuet S and Acosta D et al. On-Line Safe Flight Envelope Determination for Impaired Aircraft. Springer, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  13. Cao YH, Wu ZL and Su Y et al. Aircraft flight characteristics in icing conditions. Prog Aerosp Sci 2015; 74: 62–80. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Stapel J, de Visser CC and Van Kampen EJ et al. Efficient methods for flight envelope estimation through reachability analysis. In: AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, AIAA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  15. Helsen R, Van Kampen EJ and de Visser CC et al. Distance-fields-over-grids method for aircraft envelope determination, J Guid Control Dyn 2016; 39: 1470–80. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Wilborn J and Foster J. Defining commercial transport loss-of-control: a quantitative approach. In: AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference and Exhibit. AIAA, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  17. Goman MG, Khramtsovsky AV and Kolesnikov EN. Evaluation of aircraft performance and maneuverability by computation of attainable equilibrium sets. J Guid Control Dyn 2008; 31: 329–39. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Lu SM, Chen M and Li MS. Flight envelope predicting algorithm for uav based on UKF. In: 2019 Chinese Control Conference. IEEE, 2019, 3029–34. [Google Scholar]
  19. Tekles N, Chongvisal J and Xargay E et al. Design of a flight envelope protection system for NASA’s transport class model. J Guid Control Dyn 2017; 40: 863–77. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Yu X, Zhou XB and Zhang YM et al. Safety control design with flight envelope protection and reference command generation. IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst 2022; 58: 5835–48. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Zogopoulos Papaliakos G and Kyriakopoulos KJ. A flight envelope determination and protection system for fixed-wing UAVs. In: IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). IEEE, 2020, 9599–605. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Xie R, He HH and Meng XB et al. Neural-network-based dynamic flight envelop protection within integrated aircraft control system. J Guid Control Dyn 2023; 1–12, doi: 10.2514/1.G006872. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Sun DL, Hovakimyan N and Jafarnejad Sani H. Design of command limiting control law using exponential potential functions. J Guid Control Dyn 2020; 44: 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  24. Shin H and Kim Y. Flight envelope protection of aircraft using adaptive neural network and online linearisation. Int J Syst Sci 2016; 47: 868–85. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Zhang Y, Huang YZ and Chu QP et al. Database-driven safe flight-envelope protection for impaired aircraft. J Aerosp Inf Syst 2021; 18: 14–25. [Google Scholar]
  26. Chen M, Ma HX and Kang Y et al. Adaptive neural safe tracking control design for a class of uncertain nonlinear systems with output constraints and disturbances. IEEE Trans Cybern 2022; 52: 12571–82. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Ma HX, Chen M and Feng G et al. Disturbance-observer-based adaptive fuzzy tracking control for unmanned autonomous helicopter with flight boundary constraints. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 2022; 31: 184–98. [Google Scholar]
  28. Chen M. Constrained control allocation for overactuated aircraft using a neurodynamic model. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Syst 2015; 46: 1630–41. [Google Scholar]
  29. Snell SA. Nonlinear Dynamic-Inversion Flight Control of Supermaneuverable Aircraft. University of Minnesota, 1991. [Google Scholar]
  30. Yan XH, Chen M and Feng G et al. Fuzzy robust constrained control for nonlinear systems with input saturation and external disturbances. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 2019; 29: 345–56. [Google Scholar]
  31. Xian B, Guo JC and Zhang Y. Adaptive backstepping tracking control of a 6-DOF unmanned helicopter. IEEE/CAA J Autom Sin 2015; 2: 19–24. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. Bechlioulis CP and Rovithakis GA. Robust adaptive control of feedback linearizable mimo nonlinear systems with prescribed performance. IEEE Trans Autom Control 2008; 53: 2090–9. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. Peng ZH, Wang D and Chen ZY et al. Adaptive dynamic surface control for formations of autonomous surface vehicles with uncertain dynamics. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol 2013; 21: 513–20. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.