CSPM EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Sciengine logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 4 (2025) Security and Safety, 4 (2025) 2025008 References
Issue
Security and Safety
Volume 4, 2025
Security and Safety for Next Generation Industrial Systems
Article Number 2025008
Number of page(s) 21
Section Industrial Control
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/sands/2025008
Published online 26 October 2025
  1. Alassi A, Bañales S, Ellabban O, et al. HVDC transmission: Technology review, market trends and future outlook. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2019; 112: 530–54. [Google Scholar]
  2. Yu Y, Liu GP, Huang Y, et al. A blockchain consensus mechanism for real-time regulation of renewable energy power systems. Nat Commun 2024; 15: 10620. [Google Scholar]
  3. Raza A, Xu D, Su X, et al. A novel multiterminal VSC-HVDC transmission topology for offshore wind farms. IEEE Trans Ind Appl 2017; 53: 1316–25. [Google Scholar]
  4. Kalair A, Abas N and Khan N. Comparative study of HVAC and HVDC transmission systems. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2016; 59: 1653–75. [Google Scholar]
  5. Rehman B, ur Rehman A, Khan WA, et al. Operation and challenges of multi-infeed LCC–HVDC system: Commutation failure, AC/DC power flow, and voltage stability. Appl Sci 2021; 11: 8637. [Google Scholar]
  6. Hannan MA, Hussin I, Ker PJ, et al. Advanced control strategies of VSC based HVDC transmission system: Issues and potential recommendations. IEEE Access 2018; 6: 78352–69. [Google Scholar]
  7. Rehman A, Koondhar MA, Ali Z, et al. Critical issues of optimal reactive power compensation based on an HVAC transmission system for an offshore wind farm. Sustainability 2023; 15: 14175. [Google Scholar]
  8. Wu L, Xu M, Liu H, et al. Comprehensive voltage control strategy for new energy isolated island system aggregated by VSC-HVDC. In: 2018 International Conference on Power System Technology (POWERCON), 2018, 2129–34. [Google Scholar]
  9. Bianchi FD, Domínguez-García JL and Gomis-Bellmunt O. Control of multi-terminal HVDC networks towards wind power integration: A review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2016; 55: 1055–68. [Google Scholar]
  10. Shah S, Hassan R and Sun J. HVDC transmission system architectures and control – A review. In: 2013 IEEE 14th Workshop on Control and Modeling for Power Electronics (COMPEL), 2013, 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  11. Nguyen TV, Petit P, Maufay F, et al. Powerline Communication (PLC) on HVDC bus in a renewable energy system. Energy Procedia 2013; 36: 657–66. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Nguyen TV, Petit P, Sawicki JP, et al. DC Power-line Communication based network architecture for HVDC distribution of a renewable energy system. Energy Procedia 2014; 50: 147–54. [Google Scholar]
  13. Presekal A, Jorjani M, Rajkumar VS, et al. Cyber security of HVDC systems: A review of cyber threats, defense, and testbeds. IEEE Access 2024; 12: 165756–73. [Google Scholar]
  14. Liu M, Teng F, Zhang Z, et al. Enhancing cyber-resiliency of DER-based smart grid: A survey. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 2024; 15: 4998–5030. [Google Scholar]
  15. Zhang Z, Liu M, Sun M, et al. Vulnerability of machine learning approaches applied in IoT-based smart grid: A review. IEEE Internet Things J 2024; 11: 18951–75. [Google Scholar]
  16. Xu W, Jaimoukha IM and Teng F. Robust moving target defence against false data injection attacks in power grids. IEEE Trans Inf Forensics Secur 2023; 18: 29–40. [Google Scholar]
  17. Xu W, Higgins M, Wang J, et al. Blending data and physics against false data injection attack: An event-triggered moving target defence approach. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 2023; 14: 3176–88. [Google Scholar]
  18. Sahoo S, Dragičević T and Blaabjerg F. Cyber security in control of grid-tied power electronic converters–challenges and vulnerabilities. IEEE J Emerg Sel Topics Power Electron 2021; 9: 5326–40. [Google Scholar]
  19. Ding T, Zeng Z, Qin B, et al. Quantifying cyber attacks on industrial MMC-HVDC control system using structured pseudospectrum. IEEE Trans Power Electron 2021; 36: 4915–20. [Google Scholar]
  20. Qiu W, Sun K, Yao W, et al. Hybrid data-driven based HVDC ancillary control for multiple frequency data attacks. IEEE Trans Ind Inf 2021; 17: 8035–45. [Google Scholar]
  21. Chen B, Yim S, Kim H, et al. Cybersecurity of wide area monitoring, protection, and control systems for HVDC applications. IEEE Trans Power Syst 2021; 36: 592–602. [Google Scholar]
  22. Devnath A, Rahman MA and Rana MS. Impact analysis of cyber-attack on MMC–HVDC control system with countermeasures. Int J Dynam Control 2024; 12: 1952–62. [Google Scholar]
  23. Gholami A, Mousavi M, Srivastava AK, et al. Cyber-physical vulnerability and security analysis of power grid with HVDC line. In: 2019 North American Power Symposium (NAPS), 2019, 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  24. Jiang Q, Li B, Liu T, et al. Study of cyber attack’s impact on LCC-HVDC system with false data injection. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 2023; 14: 3220–31. [Google Scholar]
  25. Hou J, Deng H and Peng JCH. A butterfly effect: Attack-induced heterogeneous equilibrium points of high-voltage DC systems. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 2024; 15: 5992–6004. [Google Scholar]
  26. Hou J, Deng H, Gong X, et al. Infinitesimal-attack-high-impact phenomena: Cyber-attack bifurcation in two-terminal HVDC power delivery systems. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 2025; 16: 1775–89. [Google Scholar]
  27. Liu M, Zhao C, Zhang Z, et al. Converter-based moving target defense against deception attacks in DC microgrids. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 2022; 13: 3984–96. [Google Scholar]
  28. Liu M, Zhao C, Xia J, et al. PDDL: Proactive distributed detection and localization against stealthy deception attacks in DC microgrids. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 2023; 14: 714–31. [Google Scholar]
  29. Pan K, Dong J, Rakhshani E, et al. Effects of cyber attacks on AC and high-voltage DC interconnected power systems with emulated inertia. Energies 2020; 13: 5583. [Google Scholar]
  30. Liu Z, Wang Y, Lai J, et al. Markov-based stochastic stabilization control for MMC-HVDC systems with inertia supporting under random disturbances. IEEE Trans Power Syst 2024; 39: 4077–89. [Google Scholar]
  31. Fan R, Lian J, Kalsi K, et al. Impact of cyber attacks on high voltage DC transmission damping control. Energies 2018; 11: 1046. [Google Scholar]
  32. Roy SD, Debbarma S and Guerrero JM. Machine learning based multi-agent system for detecting and neutralizing unseen cyber-attacks in AGC and HVDC systems. IEEE J Emerg Sel Topics Circ Syst 2022; 12: 182–93. [Google Scholar]
  33. Zhang ZJJ, Bloch M, Pan J, et al. A passive-active intrusion detection scheme for multiterminal HVDC grid line protection attacks. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 2024; 1–12. [Google Scholar]
  34. Zhang L, Harnefors L and Nee HP. Interconnection of two very weak AC systems by VSC-HVDC links using power-synchronization control. IEEE Trans Power Syst 2011; 26: 344–55. [Google Scholar]
  35. Renedo J, García-Cerrada A and Rouco L. Reactive-power coordination in VSC-HVDC multi-terminal systems for transient stability improvement. IEEE Trans Power Syst 2017; 32: 3758–67. [Google Scholar]
  36. Vrana TK, Beerten J, Belmans R, et al. A classification of DC node voltage control methods for HVDC grids. Electr Power Syst Res 2013; 103: 137–44. [Google Scholar]
  37. Egea-Alvarez A, Beerten J, Van Hertem D, et al. Hierarchical power control of multiterminal HVDC grids. Electr Power Syst Res 2015; 121: 207–15. [Google Scholar]
  38. Yu L, Li R and Xu L. Distributed PLL-based control of offshore wind turbines connected with diode-rectifier-based HVDC systems. IEEE Trans Power Deliv 2018; 33: 1328–36. [Google Scholar]
  39. Sun K, Yao W, Fang J, et al. Impedance modeling and stability analysis of grid-connected DFIG-based wind farm with a VSC-HVDC. IEEE J Emerg Sel Topics Power Electron 2020; 8: 1375–90. [Google Scholar]
  40. Lin CH and Wu YK. Overview of frequency-control technologies for a VSC-HVDC-integrated wind farm. IEEE Access 2021; 9: 112893–921. [Google Scholar]
  41. Gao J, Liu J, Rajan B, et al. SCADA communication and security issues: SCADA communication and security issues. Secur Comm Netw 2014; 7: 175–94. [Google Scholar]
  42. Ayiad M, Maggioli E, Leite H, et al. Communication requirements for a hybrid VSC based HVDC/AC transmission networks state estimation. Energies 2021; 14: 1087. [Google Scholar]
  43. Yu Y, Liu GP and Hu W. Blockchain protocol-based secondary predictive secure control for voltage restoration and current sharing of DC microgrids. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 2023; 14: 1763–76. [Google Scholar]
  44. Center for Cyber Security, Denmark. SolarWinds: State-sponsored Global Software Supply Chain Attack, 2020. Available from: https://www.cfcs.dk/globalassets/cfcs/dokumenter/rapporter/en/CFCS-solarwinds-report-EN.pdf [accessed 2024-06-10]. [Google Scholar]
  45. Jiang X, Zhang J, Harding BJ, et al. Spoofing GPS receiver clock offset of phasor measurement units. IEEE Trans Power Syst 2013; 28: 3253–62. [Google Scholar]
  46. Yang F, Dan Z, Pan K, et al. ReThink: Reveal the threat of electromagnetic interference on power inverters. In: The Network and Distributed System Security Symposium (NDSS 2025), 2025. [Google Scholar]
  47. Bamigbade A, Dvorkin Y and Karri R. Cyberattack on phase-locked loops in inverter-based energy resources. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 2024; 15: 821–33. [Google Scholar]
  48. Wei N, Zhou N, Liao J, et al. A fault current limiter self-adapting activation strategy for flexible HVDC system based on fault severity assessment. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 2023; 70: 11334–45. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.