Security and Safety
Volume 2, 2023
Security and Safety in Unmanned Systems
Article Number 2023017
Number of page(s) 21
Section Industrial Control
Published online 23 August 2023
  1. Zhang YM and Jiang J. Bibliographical review on reconfigurable fault-tolerant control systems. Ann Rev Control 2008; 32: 229–52. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Yu ZQ, Zhang YM and Jiang J et al. A review on fault-tolerant cooperative control of multiple unmanned aerial vehicles. Chin J Aeronaut 2022; 35: 1–18. [Google Scholar]
  3. Shen QK, Shi P and Zhu JW et al. Adaptive consensus control of leader-following systems with transmission nonlinearities. Int J Control 2019; 92: 317–28. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Ding SX. A note on diagnosis and performance degradation detection in automatic control systems towards functional safety and cyber security. Secur Saf 2022; 1: 2022004. [Google Scholar]
  5. Wu JX. Problems and solutions regarding generalized functional safety in cyberspace. Secur Saf 2022; 1: 2022001. [Google Scholar]
  6. Shen QK, Shi P and Zhu JW et al. Neural networks-based distributed adaptive control of nonlinear multiagent systems. IEEE Trans Neural Networks Learn Syst 2020; 31: 1010–21. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Fattahi M and Afshar A. Resilient sampled-data control of networked control systems against cyber attacks. Int J Dyn Control 2020; 8: 205–17. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Gao S, Zhang H and Wang ZP et al. Optimal injection attack strategy for cyber-physical systems: a dynamic feedback approach. Secur Saf 2022: 1; 2022005. [Google Scholar]
  9. He WL, Xu WY and Ge XH et al. Secure control of multiagent systems against malicious attacks: a brief survey. IEEE Trans Ind Inf 2022; 18: 3595–608. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Liu H and Wang ZJ. Sampled-data-based consensus of multi-agent systems under asynchronous denial-of-service attacks. Nonlinear Anal Hybrid Syst 2021; 39: 100969. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Zhu YZ and Zheng WX. Observer-based control for cyber-physical systems with periodic DoS attacks via a cyclic switching strategy. IEEE Trans Autom Control 2020; 65: 3714–21. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Feng Z and Hu GQ. Distributed secure average consensus for linear multi-agent systems under DoS attacks. In: American Control Conference (ACC). Seattle, WA: IEEE, 2017, 2261–66. [Google Scholar]
  13. Gu Z, Huan Z and Yue D et al. Event-triggered dynamic output feedback control for networked control systems with probabilistic nonlinearities. Inf Sci 2018; 457, 458: 99–112. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hu SL, Yue D and Xie XP et al. Resilient event-triggered controller synthesis of networked control systems under periodic DoS jamming attacks. IEEE Trans Cybern 2019; 49: 4271–81. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Lu AY and Yang GH. Input-to-state stabilizing control for cyber-physical systems with multiple transmission channels under denial of service. IEEE Trans Autom Control 2018; 63: 1813–20. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Persis CD, Tesi P. 2015. Input-to-state stabilizing control under denial-of-service. IEEE Trans Autom Control, 60, 2930–44. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Dong T and Gong YL. Leader-following secure consensus for second-order multi-agent systems with nonlinear dynamics and event-triggered control strategy under DoS attack. Neurocomputing 2020; 416: 95–102. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Li ZJ, Hua CC and Li K et al. Event-triggered control for high-order uncertain nonlinear multiagent systems subject to denial-of-service Attacks. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Syst 2022; 52: 6129–38. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Shen QK, Shi Y and Jia RF et al. Design on type-2 fuzzy-based distributed supervisory control with Backlash-Like hysteresis. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 2021; 29: 252–261. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Sun YC and Yang GH. Periodic event-triggered resilient control for cyber-physical systems under denial-of-service attacks. J Franklin Inst 2018; 355: 5613–31. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Zhang XM, Han QL and Yu XH. Survey on recent advances in networked control systems. IEEE Trans Ind Inf 2016; 12: 1740–1752. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Xu WY, Ho DWC and Li LL et al. Event-triggered schemes on leader-following consensus of general linear multiagent systems Under different topologies. IEEE Trans Cybern 2017; 47: 212–23. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Astrom KJ and Bernhardsson BO. Comparison of periodic and event based sampling for first-order stochastic systems. IFAC Proceedings 1999; 32: 5006–11. [Google Scholar]
  24. Hu WF, Yang CH and Huang TW et al. A distributed dynamic event-triggered control approach to consensus of linear multiagent systems with directed networks. IEEE Trans Cybern 2020; 50: 869–74. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Fan Y, Liu L and Feng G et al. Self-triggered consensus for multi-agent systems with zeno-free triggers. IEEE Trans Autom Control 2015; 60: 2779–84. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Pan KP, Lyu Y and Pan Q. Adaptive formation for multiagent systems subject to denial-of-service attacks. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst I Regul Pap 2022; 69: 3391–3401. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. Wen GH, Duan ZS and Chen GR et al. Consensus tracking of multi-agent systems with Lipschitz-type node dynamics and switching topologies. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst I Regul Pap 2014; 61: 499–511. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. Lu AY and Yang GH. Event-triggered secure observer-based control for cyber-physical systems under adversarial attacks. Inf Sci 2017; 420: 96–109. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. Yang Y, Li YF and Yue D et al. Distributed secure consensus control with event-triggering for multiagent systems under DoS attacks. IEEE Trans Cybern 2021; 51: 2916–28. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Mohagheghi S, Venayagamoorthy GK and Harley RG. Optimal wide area controller and state predictor for a power system. IEEE Trans Power Syst 2007; 22: 693–705. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. Wang CY, Zuo ZY and Qi ZQ et al. Predictor-based extended-state-observer design for consensus of MASs with delays and disturbances. IEEE Trans Cybern 2019; 49: 1259–69. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Du J, Li J and Lewis FL. Distributed 3D time-varying formation control of underactuated AUVs with communication delays based on data-driven state predictor. IEEE Trans Ind Inf 2023; 19: 6963–71. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. Alfaki MMA and Masih S. Modeling and forecasting by using time series ARIMA models. Int J Eng Res Technol 2015; 4: 914–18. [Google Scholar]
  34. Fan DY, Sun H and Yao J et al. Well production forecasting based on ARIMA-LSTM model considering manual operations. Energy 2021; 220: 119708. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. Andres HM, Fujita H and Hayashi T et al. Forecasting of COVID19 per regions using ARIMA models and polynomial functions. Appl Soft Comput 2020; 96: 106610. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Xie YL, Jin MP and Zou ZP et al. Real-time prediction of docker container resource load based on a hybrid model of ARIMA and triple exponential smoothing. IEEE Trans Cloud Comput. 2022; 10: 1386–1401. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  37. Tabatabaie Nezhad SM, Nazari M and Gharavol EA. A novel DoS and DDoS attacks detection algorithm using ARIMA time series model and chaotic system in computer networks. IEEE Commun Lett 2016; 20: 700–3. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. Hao RL, Wang HB and Zhou MH et al. Distributed adaptive command filtered resilient event-triggered secure consensus control for multiagent systems under double DoS attacks. Expert Syst App 2023; 224: 120016. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  39. Ma BX, Wang YF and Chen G. Event-triggered type-2 fuzzy-based sliding mode control for steer-by-wire systems. Mechatronics 2022; 82: 102704. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  40. Hassan L, Zemouche A and Boutayeb M. A new observer-based controller design method for a class of time-varying delay systems with Lipschitz nonlinearities. In: 2014 American Control Conference. Portland, OR: IEEE 2014, 4163–68. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  41. Yu ZQ, Zhang YM and Liu ZX et al. Distributed adaptive fractional-order fault-tolerant cooperative control of networked unmanned aerial vehicles via fuzzy neural networks. IET Control Theory App 2019; 13: 2917–29. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.