CSPM EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 2 (2023) Security and Safety, 2 (2023) 2023012 References
Issue
Security and Safety
Volume 2, 2023
Security and Safety in the "Metaverse"
Article Number 2023012
Number of page(s) 13
Section Other Fields
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/sands/2023012
Published online 30 June 2023
  1. Brown T, Mann B, Ryder N et al. Language models are few-shot learners. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst 2020; 33: 1877–901. [Google Scholar]
  2. Chowdhery A, Narang S, Devlin J et al. Palm: Scaling language modeling with pathways, arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.02311, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  3. OpenAI. ChatGPT: Optimizing language models for dialogue, OpenAI Blog, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  4. OpenAI, GPT-4 technical report. OpenAI, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  5. Guo B, Ding Y and Sun Y et al. The mass, fake news, and cognition security. Front Comput Sci 2021; 15: 1–13. [Google Scholar]
  6. Andrade RO and Yoo SG. Cognitive security: A comprehensive study of cognitive science in cybersecurity. J Inf Secur Appl 2019; 48: 102352. [Google Scholar]
  7. Jobson KO and Hartley DS. Achieving cognitive warfare superiority amidst accelerating change. Phalanx 2022; 55: 28–31. [Google Scholar]
  8. Claverie B, Prébot B, Buchler N and Du Cluzel F. Cognitive Warfare: The Future of Cognitive Dominance, NATO Collaboration Support Office, 2022; 2: 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  9. Chen YF, Ye H and Wang DD. Theories of social preferences beyond homo economicus: A review based on the experimental economics. Nankai Econ Stud 2012; 01: 63–100. [Google Scholar]
  10. Zhou LN, Yang Z and Chu BL, et al. Overview of multimedia cognition security. J Signal Process. 2021; 37: 2440–2456. https://doi.org/10.16798/j.issn.1003-0530.2021.12.012 [Google Scholar]
  11. Fan WJ and Wang YB, Cognition security protection about the mass: A survey of key technologies. J Commun Univ China Sci Technol 2022; 29: 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  12. Toffler A. The third wave: The classic study of tomorrow. Bantam, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  13. Ke P, Zou JH and Sun XN. Launch a new round of strategy for the transformation and upgrading of cultural industry: Analysis and inspiration of “opinions on promoting the implementation of the national cultural digitalization strategy”. Inf Stud: Theory Appl 2022; 45: 1. [Google Scholar]
  14. Li Y, Li X and Shen S, et al. DTBVis: An interactive visual comparison system for digital twin brain and human brain[J]. Visual Informatics, 2023; ISSN 2468-502X, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visinf.2023.02.002. [Google Scholar]
  15. Wang WX, Zhou F and Wan YL et al. A survey of metaverse technology. Chin J Eng 2022; 44: 744–56. [Google Scholar]
  16. Parthasarathy PK, Mantri A and Mittal A et al. Digital brain building a key to improve cognitive functions by an EEG–controlled videogames as interactive learning platform. In: Congress on Intelligent Systems: Proceedings of CIS 2020. Singapore: Springer, 2021, vol. 1, 241–52. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. D’Angelo E and Jirsa V. The quest for multiscale brain modeling[J]. Trends Neurosci, 2022; Oct, 45: 777–790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2022.06.007. Epub 2022 Jul 27. PMID: 35906100 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Avramovic P, Rietdijk R and Attard M et al. Cognitive and behavioral digital health interventions for people with traumatic brain injury and their caregivers: A systematic review. J Neurotrauma 2023; 40: 159–94. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Roetzer-Pejrimovsky T, Moser AC and Atli B et al. The digital brain tumour atlas, an open histopathology resource. Sci Data 2022; 9: 55. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. O’Sullivan ED and Schofield SJ. Cognitive bias in clinical medicine. J R Coll Physicians Edinb 2018; 48: 225–32. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. MacLeod C and Mathews A, Cognitive bias modification approaches to anxiety. Annu Rev Clin Psychol 2012; 8: 189–217. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Acciarini C, Brunetta F and Boccardelli P, Cognitive biases and decision-making strategies in times of change: A systematic literature review. Manag Decis 2021; 59: 638–52. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Binz M and Schulz E. Using cognitive psychology to understand GPT-3. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2023; 120: e2218523120. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Szegedy C, Zaremba W and Sutskever I et al. Intriguing properties of neural networks. In: 2nd International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2014, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  25. Ian JG, Jonathon S and Christian S, Explaining and harnessing adversarial examples. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  26. Jia R and Liang P. Adversarial examples for evaluating reading comprehension systems. In: Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, 2017, 2021–2031. [Google Scholar]
  27. Li Y, Lyu X and Koren N et al. Anti-backdoor learning: Training clean models on poisoned data. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst 2021; 34: 14900–12. [Google Scholar]
  28. Li Y, Jiang Y and Li Z et al. Backdoor learning: A survey. In: IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  29. Lyu L, Yu H and Ma X et al. Privacy and robustness in federated learning: Attacks and defenses. In: IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 2022. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Xiao H, Biggio B and Brown G et al.. Is feature selection secure against training data poisoning? In: International Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR, 2015, 1689–98. [Google Scholar]
  31. Zhengli Z, Dheeru D and Sameer S. Generating natural adversarial examples. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  32. Yuan X, He P and Zhu Q et al. Adversarial examples: Attacks and defenses for deep learning. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst 2019; 30: 2805–24. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Saha A, Subramanya A and Pirsiavash H. Hidden trigger backdoor attacks. Proc AAAI Conf Artif Intell. 2020; 34: 11957–65. [Google Scholar]
  34. Minhao C, Wei W and Cho-Jui H. Evaluating and enhancing the robustness of dialogue systems: A case study on a negotiation agent. In: Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  35. Quiring E and Rieck K. Backdooring and poisoning neural networks with image-scaling attacks. In: 2020 IEEE Security and Privacy Workshops (SPW). IEEE, 2020, 41–7. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. Kahn J. Move over photoshop: OpenAI has just revolutionized digital image making. Fortune, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  37. Rombach R, Blattmann A and Lorenz D et al. High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2022, 10684–95. [Google Scholar]
  38. Baidu: Baidu to launch ERNIE Bot-integrated cloud service on March 27. [2023-03-21], https://finance.sina.cn/2023-03-21/detail-imymqrre3128262.d.html [Google Scholar]
  39. Ouyang L, Wu J and Jiang X et al. Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst 2022; 35: 27730–44. [Google Scholar]
  40. Fei N, Lu Z and Gao Y et al. Towards artificial general intelligence via a multimodal foundation model. Nat Commun 2022; 13: 3094. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Ororbia A and Kifer D. The neural coding framework for learning generative models. Nat Commun 2022; 13: 2064. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Le Cun Y. A path towards autonomous machine intelligence version 0.9. 2, 2022–06-27. Open Review, 62. Corpus ID: 251881108 Computer Science. https://openreview.net/pdf?id=BZ5a1r-kVsf. [Google Scholar]
  43. Williamson B. Brain data: Scanning, scraping and sculpting the plastic learning brain through neurotechnology. Postdigital Sci Edu 2019; 1: 65–86. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  44. Mehonic A and Kenyon AJ, Brain-inspired computing needs a master plan. Nature 2022; 604: 255–60. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Ji X, Dong Z and Lai CS et al. A brain-inspired in-memory computing system for neuronal communication via memristive circuits. IEEE Commun Mag 2022; 60: 100–6. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  46. Szabo B, Valencia-Aguilar A and Damas-Moreira I et al. Wild cognition–linking form and function of cognitive abilities within a natural context. Curr Opin Behav Sci 2022; 44: 101115. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  47. Hutchins E. The distributed cognition perspective on human interaction. In: Roots of Human Sociality. Routledge, 2020, 375–98. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  48. Magnani L and Magnani L, AlphaGo, locked strategies, and eco-cognitive openness. Eco-Cognit Comput: Cognit Domest Ignorant Entities 2022; 43: 45–71. [Google Scholar]
  49. Zhao Z and Zhang X, A continuous heterogeneous-agent model for the co-evolution of asset price and wealth distribution in financial market. Chaos Solitons Fractals 2022; 155: 111543. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  50. Fu Q, Ai X and Yi J et al. Learning heterogeneous agent cooperation via multiagent league training, arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.11616 2022. [Google Scholar]
  51. Rizk Y, Awad M and Tunstel EW. Cooperative heterogeneous multi-robot systems: A survey. ACM Comput Surv (CSUR) 2019; 52: 1–31. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.