CSPM EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 2 (2023) Security and Safety, 2 (2023) 2023013 References
Issue
Security and Safety
Volume 2, 2023
Security and Safety in the "Metaverse"
Article Number 2023013
Number of page(s) 14
Section Social Governance
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/sands/2023013
Published online 30 June 2023
  1. Satoshi N. Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system, Feb. 2008, https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf [Google Scholar]
  2. Li WJ, Hou G and Zhang X. A Study of the Legal Aspects of Digital Collections (NFT): Exploring the direction of copyright protection, http://www.liu-shen.com/Content-3193.html [Google Scholar]
  3. Xu K. The property law of the metaverse: Exploring NFT rules, https://sghexport.shobserver.com/html/baijiahao/2022/09/04/844001.html [Google Scholar]
  4. Pedro H. 2021 Dapp Industry Report. 17 Dec 2021, https://dappradar.com/blog/2021-dapp-industry-report [Google Scholar]
  5. Valuates Reports. Global Non-Fungible Token (NFT) Market Research Report 2022. 2022–01-05, https://reports.valuates.com/market-reports/QYRE-Auto-22P7708/global-non-fungible-token-nft [Google Scholar]
  6. Dionisio JDN, Burns WG and Gilbert R, 3D virtual worlds and the metaverse: Current status and future possibilities. ACM Comput Surv 2013; 45: 34–73. [Google Scholar]
  7. Li X. Legal attribute of machine-generated data rights and interests under intelligent digitization. North Law 2021; 15: 44–53. [Google Scholar]
  8. Lessig L. The law of the horse: What cyberlaw might teach. Harv Law Rev. 1999;113:501–49. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Marinotti J. Tangibility as technology. Georgia State Univ Law Rev 2021; 37: 678–80. [Google Scholar]
  10. Clark B and Burtsall R, Crypto-pie in the sky? How blockchain technology is impacting intellectual property law. Stanf J Blockchain Law Policy 2019; 2: 252–5. [Google Scholar]
  11. Bodó B, Gervais D and Quintais JP, Blockchain and smart contracts: The missing link in copyright licensing? Int J Law Inf Technol 2018; 10: 311–36. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Carroll R. NFTs: The latest technology challenging copyright law’s relevance within a decentralized system. Fordham Intellect Prop Media Entertain Law J 2022; 32: 979–1009. [Google Scholar]
  13. Li J. Potential risks and regulatory countermeasures for the development of token economy in metaverse. E-Government 2022; 3: 54–65. [Google Scholar]
  14. Ondrejka C. Escaping the gilded cage: User created content and building the metaverse. N Y Law Sch Law Rev 2004; 49: 81–102. [Google Scholar]
  15. China Center for Information Industry Development, Jiangsu Communication Society. The Ecological White Paper of the Metaverse Industrial Chain, 2022, 23. [Google Scholar]
  16. Brownsword R. Rights, Regulation and the Technological Revolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Patterson LR and Lindberg SW. The Nature of Copyright: A Law of Users’ Rights. Athens: University of Georgia Press, 1991. [Google Scholar]
  18. Gilder G. Post Google Era: The Decline of Big Data and the Rise of Blockchain. Beijing: Modern Press, 2018, 28–57. [Google Scholar]
  19. Li X. Legal attribute of machine-generated data rights and interests under intelligent digitization. North Law 2021; 15: 44–53. [Google Scholar]
  20. Hirschey JK. Symbiotic relationships: Pragmatic acceptance of data scraping. Berkeley Technol Law J 2014; 29: 897–918. [Google Scholar]
  21. Lessig L. Code Version 2.0. New York: Basic Books, 2006, 179. [Google Scholar]
  22. Ginsburg JC. Copyright and control over new technologies of dissemination. Columb Law Rev 2001; 101: 1613–9. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Adler A. Why art does not need copyright. George Wash Law Rev 2018; 86: 313–75. [Google Scholar]
  24. Conti R and Schmidt J. What is an NFT? Non-fungible tokens explained, https://www.forbes.com/advisor/investing/cryptocurrency/nft-non-fungible-token [Google Scholar]
  25. Vijayakumaran A. NFTs and copyright quandary. J Intellect Prop Inf Technol E-Commerce Law 2021; 12: 402–14. [Google Scholar]
  26. Gifford DJ. Innovation and creativity in the fine arts: The relevance and irrelevance of copyright. Cardozo Arts Entertain Law J 2000; 18: 569–614. [Google Scholar]
  27. Fisher K. Once upon a time in NFT: Blockchain, copyright, and the right of first sale doctrine. Cardozo Arts Entertain Law J 2019; 37: 629–34. [Google Scholar]
  28. Perzanowski A and Schultz J. Reconciling intellectual & personal property. Notre Dame Law Rev 2014; 90: 1211–64. [Google Scholar]
  29. Info Soc Directive [Directive 2001/29 on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society [2001] OJ L167/10.] art.4. [Google Scholar]
  30. Bodó B, Giannopoulou A, Quintais JP and Mezei P. The rise of NFTs: These aren’t the droids you’re looking for. Eur Intellect Prop Rev 2022; 44: 265–82. [Google Scholar]
  31. Nederlands Uitgeversverbond v Tom Kabinet Internet BV (C-263/18) EU:C:2019:1111; [2020] 2 C.M.L.R. 20. [Google Scholar]
  32. Patel N. Can the law keep up with crypto? https://www.theverge.com/22944579/crypto-bitcoin-Internet-law-nft-tiktok-dances-tonya-evans-interview [https://perma.cc/9NJA-HYJA]. [Google Scholar]
  33. Evans TM. Cryptokitties, cryptography, and copyright. AIPLA Quart J 2019; 47: 219–46. [Google Scholar]
  34. Nimmer RT. Breaking barriers: The relation between contract and intellectual property law. Berkeley Technol Law J 1998; 13: 827–31. [Google Scholar]
  35. 131 F.3d 1011, 1014-15 (Fed. Cir. 1997). [Google Scholar]
  36. Carroll R. NFTs: The latest technology challenging copyright law’s relevance within a decentralized system. Fordham Intellect Prop Media Entertain Law J 2022; 32: 979–1009. [Google Scholar]
  37. Zhao J. The legal regulation path of “metaverse”’ security risk: From hypothetical regulation to process risk prevention. J Shanghai Univ (Soc Sci Edn) 2022; 39: 103–15. [Google Scholar]
  38. Sun Y. On the metaverse and the adjustment of legal order in intelligent society. Res Rule Law 2022; 2: 45–56. [Google Scholar]
  39. https://www.nftcn.com.cn/pc/#/Notice_deta_user_f [Google Scholar]
  40. Vasan K, Janosov M and Barabási AL, Quantifying NFT-driven networks in crypto art. Sci Rep 2022; 12: 2769. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Evans TM. Cryptokitties, cryptography, and copyright, AIPLA Quart J. 2019; 2: 47. [Google Scholar]
  42. Hoboken J. Hosting intermediary services and illegal content online: An analysis of the scope of article 14 ECD in light of developments in the online service landscape, https://dare.uva.nl/search?identifier=db3fa078-e225-4336-95ec-5d6f25731799 [Google Scholar]
  43. Shapiro v. Thompson, 394 U.S. 618 (1969). [Google Scholar]
  44. A&M Records, Inc. v. Napster Inc, 239 F.3d 1004, 1027 (9th Cir. 2001). [Google Scholar]
  45. Joined cases Peterson v Google LLC; Elsevier Inc v Cyando AG (C-682/18; C-683/18) EU:C:2020:586; [2020] E.C.D.R. 16; EU:C:2021:503; [2021] E.C.D.R. 13. [Google Scholar]
  46. Peterson v Google LLC; Elsevier Inc v Cyando AG [2020] E.C.D.R. 16; [2021] E.C.D.R. 13 at [84]. [Google Scholar]
  47. Wang Q. On the legal nature of NFT digital works trading. Orient Law 2023; 1: 18–35. [Google Scholar]
  48. https://www.nftcn.com.cn/pc/#/Notice_deta__user_f [Google Scholar]
  49. Li J. Potential risks and regulatory countermeasures for the development of token economy in metaverse. E-Government 2022; 3: 54–65. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.