CSPM EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Sciengine logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 4 (2025) Security and Safety, 4 (2025) 2025015 References
Issue
Security and Safety
Volume 4, 2025
Security and Safety for Next Generation Industrial Systems
Article Number 2025015
Number of page(s) 27
Section Information Network
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/sands/2025015
Published online 30 October 2025
  1. Priyanka IH and Khalique A. Random number generators and their applications: a review 2019; 7: 1777–81. [Google Scholar]
  2. Du M, Chen Q and Liu L et al. A blockchain-based random number generation algorithm and the application in blockchain games. In: 2019 IEEE Int. Conf. Syst. Man Cybern. (SMC), Bari, Italy, 2019, 3498–503, http://doi.org/10.1109/SMC.2019.8914618. [Google Scholar]
  3. Ashraf A and Elmedany W. Authentication in IoT devices using blockchain technology: A review. In: 4th Smart Cities Symp. (SCS 2021), Online Conference, Bahrain, 2021, 545–51, http://doi.org/10.1049/icp.2022.0398. [Google Scholar]
  4. Choi J, Shin W and Kim J et al. Random seed generation for IoT key generation and key management system using blockchain. In: 2020 Int. Conf. Inform. Networking (ICOIN), Barcelona, Spain, 2020, 663–5, http://doi.org/10.1109/ICOIN48656.2020.9016518. [Google Scholar]
  5. Ansari U, Chaudhary AK and Verma S. True random number generator (TRNG) using sensors for low cost IoT applications. In: 2022 Int. Conf. Commun. Comput. Internet Things (IC3IoT), Chennai, India, 2022, 1–6, http://doi.org/10.1109/IC3IOT53935.2022.9767999. [Google Scholar]
  6. Pan Q, Wu J and Zheng X et al. Differential privacy and IRS empowered intelligent energy harvesting for 6G internet of things. IEEE Internet Things J 2022; 9, 22109–22, http://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2021.3104833. [Google Scholar]
  7. Pan Q, Wu J and Bashir AK et al. Joint protection of energy security and information privacy for energy harvesting: an incentive federated learning approach. IEEE Trans Indust Inf 2022; 18: 3473–83, http://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2021.3105492. [Google Scholar]
  8. Lee K, Lee, S-Y and Seo C et al. TRNG (True Random Number Generator) Method using visible spectrum for secure communication on 5G network. IEEE Access 2018; 6: 12838–47, http://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2799682. [Google Scholar]
  9. Priyanka IH and Aqeel K. Random number generators and their applications: a review 2019; 7: 1777–81. [Google Scholar]
  10. Arciuolo T and Elleithy KM. Parallel, true random number generator (P-TRNG): using parallelism for fast true random number generation in hardware. In: 2021 IEEE 11th Annual Computing and Communication Workshop and Conference (CCWC), NV, USA, 2021, 0987–92, http://doi.org/10.1109/CCWC51732.2021.9375939. [Google Scholar]
  11. Yang J et al. A low cost and high reliability true random number generator based on resistive random access memory. In: 2015 IEEE 11th International Conference on ASIC (ASICON), Chengdu, China, 2015, 1–4, http://doi.org/10.1109/ASICON.2015.7516996. [Google Scholar]
  12. Stipčević M and Koç Ç K. True random number generators. Open Problems in Mathematics and Computational Science. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2014, 275–315. [Google Scholar]
  13. Hong SL and Liu C. Sensor-based random number generator seeding. IEEE Access 2015; 3: 562–8. [Google Scholar]
  14. Fischer V and Drutarovský M. True random number generator embedded in reconfigurable hardware. In: Int. Workshop Cryptogr. Hardware Embedded Syst. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2002, 415–30. [Google Scholar]
  15. Kumkar V, Tiwari A and Tiwari P et al. Vulnerabilities of wireless security protocols (WEP and WPA2). Int J Adv Res Comput Eng Technol (IJARCET) 2012; 1: 34–8. [Google Scholar]
  16. Ansari U, Chaudhary AK and Verma S. Enhanced true random number generator (TRNG) using sensors for IoT security applications. In: 2022 Third Int. Conf. Intell. Comput. Instrum. Control Technol. (ICICICT), 2022, 1593–97. [Google Scholar]
  17. Ghafoor I, Jattala I and Durrani S. et al. Analysis of openSSL heartbleed vulnerability for embedded systems. In: 17th IEEE Int. Multi Topic Conf. 2014. IEEE, 2014, 314–9. [Google Scholar]
  18. Bernstein DJ, Lange T and Niederhagen R. Dual EC: A standardized back door. The New Codebreakers: Essays Dedicated to David Kahn on the Occasion of His 85th Birthday. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2016, 256–81. [Google Scholar]
  19. Cho S, Hong E and Seo S, Random number generator using sensors for drone. IEEE Access 2020; 8: 30343–54. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Applegate MJ, Thomas O and Dynes JF et al. Efficient and robust quantum random number generation by photon number detection. Appl Phys Lett 2015; 107: 071106. http://doi.org/10.1063/1.4928732. [Google Scholar]
  21. Witek K, Caccia M and Kucewicz W et al. A method for implementing a SHA256 hardware accelerator inside an quantum true random number generator (QTRNG). In: 2023 30th Int. Conf. Mixed Design Integ. Circuits Syst. (MIXDES), Krakw, Poland, 2023, 251–6, http://doi.org/10.23919/MIXDES58562.2023.10203268. [Google Scholar]
  22. Gimenez G, Cherkaoui A and Frisch R et al. Self-timed ring based true random number generator: threat model and countermeasures. In: 2017 IEEE 2nd Int. Verif. Secur. Workshop (IVSW), Thessaloniki, Greece, 2017, 31–8, http://doi.org/10.1109/IVSW.2017.8031541. [Google Scholar]
  23. Pdv-p8104 datasheet. [Google Scholar]
  24. Degada A and Thapliyal H. Harnessing uncertainty in photoresistor sensor for true random number generation in IoT devices. In: 2020 IEEE Int. Conf. Consumer Electron. (ICCE), 2020, 1–5, http://doi.org/10.1109/ICCE46568.2020.9042967. [Google Scholar]
  25. Mller-Olm M and Seidl H. Analysis of modular arithmetic. In: Programming Languages and Systems: 14th European Symp. Programming, ESOP 2005, Held as Part of the Joint European Conferences on Theory and Practice of Software, ETAPS 2005, Edinburgh, UK, April 4-8, 2005. Proceedings 14, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2005, 46–60. [Google Scholar]
  26. Georgescu C, Simion E and Nita AP et al. A view on NIST randomness tests (in) dependence. In: 2017 9th Int. Conf. Electron. Comput. Artif. Intell. (ECAI), IEEE, 2017, 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  27. Randao Provably Fair Random Number White Paper, randao.org, September, 11, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  28. Crocetti L, Nannipieri P and Di Matteo S et al. Review of methodologies and metrics for assessing the quality of random number generators. Electronics 2023; 12: 723. [Google Scholar]
  29. Wang Y, Yu W and Wu S et al. Flash memory for ubiquitous hardware security functions: true random number generation and device fingerprints. In: 2012 IEEE Symp. Secur. Privacy, IEEE, 2012, 33–47. [Google Scholar]
  30. Kalai YT and Raz R. Interactive pcp. International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2008, 536–47. [Google Scholar]
  31. Alturki MA and Roşu G. Statistical model checking of RANDAOs resilience to pre-computed reveal strategies. In: Formal Methods. FM 2019 International Workshops: Porto, Portugal, October 7–11, 2019, Revised Selected Papers, Part I 3. Springer International Publishing, 2020, 337–49. [Google Scholar]
  32. Han R, Lin H and Yu J. Randchain: a scalable and fair decentralized randomness beacon. Cryptology ePrint Archive, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  33. Alturki MA and Roşu G. Statistical model checking of RANDAOs resilience to pre-computed reveal strategies. In: Formal Methods. FM 2019 Int. Workshops: Porto, Portugal, October 7–11, 2019, Revised Selected Papers, Part I 3. Springer International Publishing, 2020, 337–49. [Google Scholar]
  34. Jia Z, Chen R and Li J. Delottery: a novel decentralized lottery system based on blockchain technology. in: Proc. 2019 2nd Int. Conf. Blockchain Technol. Appl. 2019, 20–5. [Google Scholar]
  35. Rahman A, Nasir MK and Rahman Z et al. Distblockbuilding: a distributed blockchain-based sdn-iot network for smart building management. IEEE Access 2020; 8: 140008–18. [Google Scholar]
  36. Han R, Yu J and Lin H. RandChain: decentralised randomness beacon from sequential proof-of-work. IACR Cryptol. ePrint Arch 2020; 2020: 1033. [Google Scholar]
  37. Komargodski I and Tamir Y. On distributed randomness generation in blockchains. International Symposium on Cyber Security, Cryptology, and Machine Learning, Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, 2023, 49–64. [Google Scholar]
  38. Lokshina IV, Gregu M and Thomas WL. Application of integrated building information modeling, IoT and blockchain technologies in system design of a smart building. Procedia Comput Sci 2019; 160: 497–502. [Google Scholar]
  39. Van Cutsem O, Dac DH and Boudou P et al. Cooperative energy management of a community of smart-buildings: A Blockchain approach. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 2020; 117: 105643. [Google Scholar]
  40. Liu Z, Chi Z and Osmani M et al. Blockchain and building information management (BIM) for sustainable building development within the context of smart cities. Sustainability 2021; 13: 2090. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  41. Frustaci F, Spagnolo F and Corsonello P et al. A high-speed and low-power DSP-based TRNG for FPGA implementations. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst II: Express Briefs 2024; [Google Scholar]
  42. Chen T, Ma Y and Lin J et al. A lightweight full entropy TRNG with on-chip entropy assurance. IEEE Trans Comput-Aided Design Integr Circuits Syst 2021; 40: 2431–44. [Google Scholar]
  43. Morsali M, Moaiyeri MH and Rajaei R. A process variation resilient spintronic true random number generator for highly reliable hardware security applications. Microelectron J 2022; 129: 105606. [Google Scholar]
  44. Williams S, Khalil K, Bayoumi M. A Novel 0.04 pJ/bit dynamic TRNG using bit reconfigurable ring oscillators. In: SoutheastCon 2024, 2024, 1546–52. [Google Scholar]
  45. McCullough BD. A review of TESTU01., 2006, 677–82. [Google Scholar]
  46. Suciu A, Toma RA and Marton K. Parallel implementation of the TestU01 statistical test suite. In: 2012 IEEE 8th Int. Conf. Intell. Comput. Commun. Process., Cluj-Napoca, Romania, 2012, 317–22, http://doi.org/10.1109/ICCP.2012.6356206. [Google Scholar]
  47. Barak B, Shaltiel R and Tromer E. True random number generators secure in a changing environment. In: Cryptographic Hardware and Embedded Systems-CHES 2003: 5th Int. Workshop, Cologne, Germany, September 8–10, 2003. Proceedings 5, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2003, 166–80. [Google Scholar]
  48. Wang X, Zhang R and Wang Y et al. A 0.116pJ/bit latch-based true random number generator with static inverter selection and noise enhancement. In: 2022 Int. Symp. VLSI Design Automation Test (VLSI-DAT), Hsinchu, Taiwan, 2022, 1–4, http://doi.org/10.1109/VLSI-DAT54769.2022.9768078. [Google Scholar]
  49. Kohlbrenner P and Gaj K. An embedded true random number generator for FPGAs. In: Proc. 2004 ACM/SIGDA 12th Int. Symp. Field Programmable Gate Arrays, 2004, 71–8. [Google Scholar]
  50. Roić V and Verbauwhede I. Hardware-efficient post-processing architectures for true random number generators. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst II: Express Briefs 2019; 66: 1242–6. [Google Scholar]
  51. Pan Q, Wu J and Zheng X et al. Differential privacy and IRS empowered intelligent energy harvesting for 6G internet of things. IEEE Int Things J 2022; 9: 22109–22, http://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2021.3104833. [Google Scholar]
  52. Yao Y, Chen X and Kang W et al. Thermal brownian motion of skyrmion for true random number generation. IEEE Trans Electron Devices 2020; 67: 2553–8, http://doi.org/10.1109/TED.2020.2989420. [Google Scholar]
  53. Mezher AE. Enhanced RSA cryptosystem based on multiplicity of public and private keys. Int J Electr Comput Eng 2018; 8: 3949. [Google Scholar]
  54. Schuba CL, Krsul IV and Kuhn MG et al. Analysis of a denial of service attack on TCP. Proc. 1997 IEEE Symp. Secur. Privacy (Cat. No. 97CB36097), IEEE, 1997, 208–23. [Google Scholar]
  55. Liu P. Public-key encryption secure against related randomness attacks for improved end-to-end security of cloud/edge computing. IEEE Access 2020; 8: 16750–9, http://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2967457. [Google Scholar]
  56. Peng Y, Zhao H and Sun X et al. A side-channel attack resistant AES with 500Mbps, 1.92pJ/Bit PVT variation tolerant true random number generator. In: 2017 IEEE Comput. Soc. Ann. Symposium VLSI (ISVLSI), Bochum, Germany, 2017, 249–54, http://doi.org/10.1109/ISVLSI.2017.51. [Google Scholar]
  57. Teng X, Liu X and Zhang Y. A UHF passive RFID tag front-end design with a novel true random number generator. In: IEEE Access, http://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3378128. [Google Scholar]
  58. Guy J, Ambrosi E and Wu C-H et al. Ultrafast ~7 Mbps true random number generator based on SNGCT selector. IEEE Trans Electron Devices 2024; 71: 2794–800, http://doi.org/10.1109/TED.2024.3371424. [Google Scholar]
  59. Zhang Z et al. Ultra-fast true random number generator based on ill-posedness nucleation of skyrmion bags in ferrimagnets. In: IEEE Electron Device Lett 2024; 45: 917–20, http://doi.org/10.1109/LED.2024.3368210. [Google Scholar]
  60. Pandey SK and Jenef R. A comparative study and analysis of quantum random number generator with true random number generator, In: 2024 16th Int. Conf. COMmun. Syst. NETworkS (COMSNETS), Bengaluru, India, 2024, 1000–5, http://doi.org/10.1109/COMSNETS59351.2024.10426934. [Google Scholar]
  61. Chen Y, Tian Y and Zhou R et al. NDSTRNG: non-deterministic sampling-based true random number generator on SoC FPGA systems. IEEE Trans Comput 2024; 73: 1313–26, http://doi.org/10.1109/TC.2024.3365955. [Google Scholar]
  62. Yang S et al. Lightweight hybrid entropy source true random number generator based On jitter and metastability. In: IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. II: Express Briefs, http://doi.org/10.1109/TCSII.2024.3363015. [Google Scholar]
  63. Kim J and Chae H. A 10-Gb/s True random number generator using ML-resistant middle square method. IEEE J Solid-State Circuits, http://doi.org/10.1109/JSSC.2023.3346428. [Google Scholar]
  64. Wang X, Zhang R and Liu K et al. A 0.116 pJ/bit latch-based true random number generator featuring static inverter selection and noise enhancement. IEEE Trans Very Large Scale Integr (VLSI) Syst 2024; 32: 564–72, http://doi.org/10.1109/TVLSI.2023.3328602. [Google Scholar]
  65. Zanotti T et al. Reliability analysis of random telegraph noisebased true random number generators. In: 2023 IEEE Int. Integr. Reliab. Workshop (IIRW), South Lake Tahoe, CA, USA, 2023, 1–6, http://doi.org/10.1109/IIRW59383.2023.10477697. [Google Scholar]
  66. Anagnostopoulos NA et al. A method to construct efficient carbon-nanotube-based physical unclonable functions and true random number generators. In: 2023 26th Euromicro Conf. Digital Syst. Design (DSD), Golem, Albania, 2023, 61–9, http://doi.org/10.1109/DSD60849.2023.00019. [Google Scholar]
  67. Petura O, Mureddu U and Bochard N et al. A survey of AIS-20/31 compliant TRNG cores suitable for FPGA devices. In: 2016 26th Int. Conf. Field Programmable Logic Appl. (FPL), IEEE, 2016, 1–10. [Google Scholar]
  68. Rasheed AF, Zarkoosh M and Abbas SF. Comprehensive evaluation of encryption algorithms: a study of 22 performance tests. In: 2023 Sixth Int. Conf. Vocational Educ. Electr. Eng. (ICVEE), Surabaya, Indonesia, 2023, 191–4, http://doi.org/10.1109/ICVEE59738.2023.10348240. [Google Scholar]
  69. Luo Y, Wang W and Best S et al. A high-performance and secure TRNG based on chaotic cellular automata topology, IEEE Trans Circuits Syst I: Regular Papers 2020; 67: 4970–83, http://doi.org/10.1109/TCSI.2020.3019030. [Google Scholar]
  70. Pareschi F, Rovatti R and Setti G. On statistical tests for randomness included in the NIST SP800-22 test suite and based on the binomial distribution. IEEE Trans Inf Forensics Secur 2012; 7: 491–505. [Google Scholar]
  71. Iwasaki A. Analysis of NIST SP800-22 focusing on randomness of each sequence. JSIAM Lett 2018; 10: 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  72. Dong L, Zeng Y and Ji L et al. Study on the pass rate of NIST SP800-22 statistical test suite. In: 2014 Tenth International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Security, IEEE, 2014, 402–4. [Google Scholar]
  73. Chen D, Chen H and Fan L et al. Error analysis of NIST SP 800-22 test suite. IEEE Trans Inf Forensics Secur 2023. [Google Scholar]
  74. Adesina NO, Wang B and Morell W et al. Experimental analyses of a noise-based true random number generator. In: 2023 IEEE 13th Ann. Comput. Commun. Workshop Conf. (CCWC), Las Vegas, NV, USA, 2023, 0915–8, http://doi.org/10.1109/CCWC57344.2023.10099239. [Google Scholar]
  75. L’ecuyer P and Richard S. TestU01: AC library for empirical testing of random number generators. ACM Trans Math Software (TOMS) 2007; 33: 1–40. [Google Scholar]
  76. Susanti BH, Jimmy J and Mareta WA. ENT randomness test on DM-PRESENT-80 and DM-PRESENT-128-based pseudorandom number generator. In: 2021 4th International Seminar on Research of Information Technology and Intelligent Systems (ISRITI), IEEE, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  77. Walker J, ENT-A pseudorandom number sequence test program, Fourmilab, 06. 2009. [Google Scholar]
  78. NIST Statistical Test Suite, 06. 2009. [Google Scholar]
  79. Marsaglia G, The diehard test suite, 06. 2009. [Google Scholar]
  80. Alani MM. Testing randomness in ciphertext of block-ciphers using DieHard tests. Int J Comput Sci Netw Secur 2010; 10: 53–7. [Google Scholar]
  81. Brown RG, Eddelbuettel D and Bauer D. Dieharder, Duke University Physics Department Durham, NC, 2018, 27708–0305. [Google Scholar]
  82. Abdulhameed HA et al. A lightweight hybrid cryptographic algorithm for WSNs tested by the diehard tests and the raspberry Pi.In: 2022 Int. Conf. Comput. Sci. Software Eng. (CSASE), IEEE, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  83. Andrew Rukhin (NIST), Juan Soto (NIST), James Nechvatal (NIST), Miles Smid (NIST), Elaine Barker (NIST), Stefan Leigh (NIST), Mark Levenson (NIST), Mark Vangel (NIST), David Banks (NIST), N. Heckert (NIST), James Dray (NIST), San Vo (NIST), Lawrence Bassham (NIST), A Statistical Test Suite for Random and Pseudorandom Number Generators for Cryptographic Applications, NIST SP 800-22 Rev. 1 [Google Scholar]
  84. Marek S et al. A bad day to die hard: correcting the dieharder battery. J Cryptol 2022; 35: 1–20. [Google Scholar]
  85. Nagarajan KK. Randomness Analysis of YUGAM-128 Using Diehard Test Suite, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  86. George M and Tsang WW. Some difficult-to-pass tests of randomness. J Stat Software 2002; 7: 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  87. Anastasios B, Nastou PE and Petroudis G et al. Random number generators: principles and applications. Cryptography 2023; 7: 54, http://doi.org/10.3390/cryptography7040054. [Google Scholar]
  88. Fei Y, Lixiang L and Qiang T et al. A survey on true random number generators based on chaos. Discr Dyn Nat Soc 2019; 2545123: 10, http://doi.org/10.1155/2019/2545123. [Google Scholar]
  89. Bakiri M et al. Survey on hardware implementation of random number generators on FPGA: Theory and experimental analyses. Comput Sci Rev 2018; 27: 135–53. [Google Scholar]
  90. Wen Y and Weize Y. Machine learningresistant pseudorandom number generator. Electron Lett 2019; 55: 515–7. [Google Scholar]
  91. Truong ND et al. Machine learning cryptanalysis of a quantum random number generator. IEEE Trans Inf Forensics Secur 2018; 14: 403–14. [Google Scholar]
  92. Ash-Saki A, Alam M and Ghosh S. Improving reliability of quantum true random number generator using machine learning. In: 2020 21st Int. Symp. Quality Electron. Design (ISQED). IEEE, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  93. Wali A, Ravichandran H and Das S. A machine learning attack resilient true random number generator based on stochastic programming of atomically thin transistors. ACS nano 2021; 15: 17804–12. [Google Scholar]
  94. Kumar S. Analyzing efficiency of Pseudo-Random Number Generators using Machine Learning. In: Proc. 4th Int. Conf. Inf. Network Secur. 2016. [Google Scholar]
  95. Li C et al. Deep learning-based security verification for a random number generator using white chaos. Entropy 2020; 22: 1134. [Google Scholar]
  96. Yu Y, Moraitis M and Dubrova E. Can deep learning break a true random number generator? IEEE Trans Circ Syst II: Express Briefs 2021; 68: 1710–4. [Google Scholar]
  97. Barakbayeva T, Zhuo C and Amir G. SRNG: An efficient decentralized approach for secret random number generation. In: IEEE Int. Conf. Blockchain Cryptocurrency (ICBC), 2024. [Google Scholar]
  98. Mar’ah L, Mulyawan R and Suksmono AB. Quantum random number generation for secure communications using hybrid hadamard controlled-NOT gates with XOR bitmask. In: 2024 IEEE Int. Conf. Adv. Telecommun. Networking Technol. (ATNT), Johor Bahru, Malaysia, 2024, 1–4, http://doi.org/10.1109/ATNT61688.2024.10719212. [Google Scholar]
  99. Nguyen-Van T et al. A system for scalable decentralized random number generation. In: 2019 IEEE 23rd Int. Enterprise Distributed Object Comput. Workshop (EDOCW), IEEE, 2019 [Google Scholar]
  100. Son DH, Tran Thi TQ and Le Quang M. RANDAO-based RNG: last revealer attacks in ethereum 2.0 randomness and a potential solution. arXiv preprint arXiv:https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.09541, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  101. Hsieh C-H et al. BCsRNG: a secure random number generator based on blockchain. IEEE Access 2022; 10: 98117–26. [Google Scholar]
  102. Bernstein DJ, Lange T and Niederhagen R. Dual EC: A Standardized Back Door. In The New Codebreakers, Springer, 2016. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.