CSPM EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 4 (2025) Security and Safety, 4 (2025) 2024018 References
Issue
Security and Safety
Volume 4, 2025
Security and Safety of Data in Cloud Computing
Article Number 2024018
Number of page(s) 18
Section Software Engineering
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/sands/2024018
Published online 30 January 2025
  1. Gao Q, Zhou F and Zhang K et al. Identifying human mobility via trajectory embeddings. IJCAI 2017; 17: 1689–1695. [Google Scholar]
  2. Das G, Gunopulos D and Mannila H. Finding similar time series. In: European Symposium on Principles of Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1997, 88–100. [Google Scholar]
  3. Yi BK, Jagadish HV and Faloutsos C. Efficient retrieval of similar time sequences under time warping. In: Proceedings 14th International Conference on Data Engineering. IEEE, 1998, 201–208. [Google Scholar]
  4. Mikolov T, Chen K and Corrado G et al. Efficient estimation of word representations in vector space. arXiv preprint https://arxiv.org/abs/1301.3781, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  5. Sun T, Xu Y and Wang F et al. Trajectory-user link with attention recurrent networks. In: 2020 25th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR). IEEE, 2021, 4589–4596. [Google Scholar]
  6. Li H, Cao S and Chen Y et al. TULAM: trajectory-user linking via attention mechanism. Sci China Inf Sci 2024; 67: 112103. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Wang G, Liao D and Li J. Complete user mobility via user and trajectory embeddings. IEEE Access 2018; 6: 72125–72136. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Yu Y, Tang H and Wang F et al. Tulsn: siamese network for trajectory-user linking. In: 2020 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN). IEEE 2020; 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  9. Miao C, Wang J and Yu H et al. Trajectory-user linking with attentive recurrent network. In: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, 2020, 878–886. [Google Scholar]
  10. Chen W, Li S and Huang C et al. Mutual distillation learning network for trajectory-user linking. arXiv preprint https://arxiv.org/abs/2205.03773, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  11. Freudiger J, Shokri R and Hubaux JP. Evaluating the privacy risk of location-based services. In: Financial Cryptography and Data Security: 15th International Conference, FC 2011, Gros Islet, St. Lucia, February 28-March 4, 2011, Revised Selected Papers 15. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2012, 31–46. [Google Scholar]
  12. Zang H and Bolot J. Anonymization of location data does not work: A large-scale measurement study. In: Proceedings of the 17th Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking, 2011, 145–156. [Google Scholar]
  13. De Montjoye YA, Hidalgo CA and Verleysen M et al. Unique in the crowd: The privacy bounds of human mobility. Sci Rep 2013; 3: 1–5. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Chen L, Özsu MT and Oria V. Robust and fast similarity search for moving object trajectories. In: Proceedings of the 2005 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, 2005, 491–502. [Google Scholar]
  15. Xiao X, Zheng Y and Luo Q et al. Finding similar users using category-based location history. In: Proceedings of the 18th SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems, 2010, 442–445. [Google Scholar]
  16. Ashbrook D and Starner T. Learning significant locations and predicting user movement with GPS. In: Proceedings. Sixth International Symposium on Wearable Computers. IEEE, 2002, 101–108. [Google Scholar]
  17. Chen Z, Fu Y and Zhang M et al. The de-anonymization method based on user spatio-temporal mobility trace. In: Information and Communications Security: 19th International Conference, ICICS 2017, Beijing, China, December 6-8, 2017, Proceedings 19. Springer International Publishing, 2018, 459–471. [Google Scholar]
  18. Huo Z, Meng X and Zhang R. Feel free to check-in: Privacy alert against hidden location inference attacks in GeoSNs. In: Database Systems for Advanced Applications: 18th International Conference, DASFAA 2013, Wuhan, China, April 22-25, 2013. Proceedings, Part I 18. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2013, 377–391. [Google Scholar]
  19. Sadilek A, Kautz H and Bigham JP. Finding your friends and following them to where you are. In: Proceedings of the fifth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, 2012, 723–732. [Google Scholar]
  20. Yang D, Zhang D and Zheng VW et al. Modeling user activity preference by leveraging user spatial temporal characteristics in LBSNs. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Syst 2014; 45: 129–142. [Google Scholar]
  21. Zhou F, Gao Q and Trajcevski G et al. Trajectory-User Linking via Variational AutoEncoder. IJCAI, 2018, 3212–3218. [Google Scholar]
  22. Cover T and Hart P. Nearest neighbor pattern classification. IEEE Trans Inf Theory 1967; 13: 21–27. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Hu X, Han Y and Geng Z. Novel trajectory representation learning method and its application to trajectory-user linking. IEEE Trans Instrum Measur 2021; 70: 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  24. Cho E, Myers SA and Leskovec J. Friendship and mobility: User movement in location-based social networks. In: Proceedings of the 17th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 2011, 1082–1090. [Google Scholar]
  25. Zheng Y, Zhang L and Xie X et al. Mining interesting locations and travel sequences from GPS trajectories. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on World Wide Web, 2009, 791–800. [Google Scholar]
  26. Zheng Y, Li Q and Chen Y et al. Understanding mobility based on GPS data. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing, 2008, 312–321. [Google Scholar]
  27. Zheng Y, Xie X and Ma WY. GeoLife: A collaborative social networking service among user, location and trajectory. IEEE Data Eng Bull 2010; 33: 32–39. [Google Scholar]
  28. Kingma DP and Ba J. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. arXiv preprint https://arxiv.org/abs/1412.6980, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  29. Srivastava N, Hinton G and Krizhevsky A et al. Dropout: a simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting. J Mach Learn Res 2014; 15: 1929–1958. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.