Table 4.

Efficiency comparison between [16] and our schemes

Schemes Computation costs
Communation costs
Storage costs
Setup Trapdoor Search Setup Search Cloud server 1
m(L + 1)TE mTE (L2 + 2L + 3)mTM + (L2 + 4L) 2(L + 1)m|ℤN2| (4mL + 8m + 4L + 2)|ℤN2| 2(L + 1)m|ℤN2|
Wang et al.’s scheme [16] mTA + 4LmTE + 2LmTD
SAP-ECKS m(L + 1)TR m T E $ mT_{E}\prime $ (4L + 2)mTM + (4mL+ 2(L + 1)m|ℝ| (L + 1)m|ℝ|+(2mL + 2m+ 2(L + 1)m|ℝ|
2m − 2L − 1)TA 2L + 1)|ℤN2|
SAP-VECKS m(L + 1)TR 2 m T E $ 2mT_{E}\prime $ (8L + 6)mTM + (4mL+ 2(L + 1)m|ℝ| (2L + 2)m|ℝ|+(4mL + 4m+ 2(L + 1)m|ℝ|
2m + 8L + 2)TA 4L + 2)|ℤN2|

TE, T E $ T_{E}\prime $, TD, TA, TM, and TR represent the time cost of a BCP encryption operation, a Paillier encryption operation, a decryption operation, a homomorphic addition operation, a multiplication operation between a ciphertext and a random number, and a multiplication operatation, respectively. m is the number of keywords in the keyword dictionary. |ℝ| and |ℤN2| are the bit lengths of the elements in ℝ and ℤN2.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.