Table 3.

Efficiency comparison among the schemes and ours

Schemes Computation costs
Communication costs
Storage costs
Setup Trapdoor Search Setup Search Cloud server
Shang et al.’s scheme [18] O(|DB|S) O((|DB|+F + F ⋅ L)S) O(|DB|L) O(|DB|S) O((|DB|+F + F ⋅ L)S) O(|DB|S)
Wang et al.’s scheme [16] O(mL) O(m) O(mL) O(mL) O(mL) O(mL)
SAP-ECKS O(mL) O(m) O(mL) O(mL) O(mL) O(mL)
SAP-VECKS O(mL) O(m) O(mL) O(mL) O(mL) O(mL)

|BD|, m, S, F and L represents the number of documents in the database, the number of distinct keywords in the database, the maximum number of distinct keywords in a document, the number of distinct document labels in the database and the maximum cardinality of a document set of files containing a keyword, respectively.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.